One of the biggest myths in the hobby is that flow and turn-over rate is important. If I have two Sunsun 304s on a tank with two plastic pot scrubbers in each filter turning over the water 6X per hour, will this be better than one Sunsun 304 filled with forty plastic pot scrubbers and turning over the tank at 2X per hour? Of course not! It is the volume of the filter and the surface area of the filter media which is important, not the turn-over.
The concept that flow is important was tested. It showed doubling the flow rate added some 9% to the filter capacity. All the social media gurus say it should double the capacity. This test can be found at this link:
The Europeans do not consider flow through a filter very important and often have very beautiful aquariums with very low flow rates, in the range of one turnover per hour. But filter manufacturers in the USA have come up with the concept that flow is the deciding variable in canister filters. This is because it is cheaper to put a large pump on a small canister than it is to put a small pump on a large canister. The profit motive strikes again!
The gallons of media a canister can fit in is MUCH more important than the flow rate. Yet in the USA it is impossible to find the gallons of media capacity for a canister filter. One has to calculate it by multiplying the width times the height times the length.
One very misunderstood topic is the flow through the filters and the function of that flow. The flow through the filters does the following important tasks:
- The most important function is to supply the “beneficial bacteria” (autotrophic) on the surface and in the interstices of the biomedia a constant supply of ammonia from the fish.
- The second most important function is to supply a different type of bacteria (heterotrophic) on the surface and in the interstices of the biomedia a constant supply of carbohydrates and proteins from uneaten food to create crystal-clear water.
- It can do some aeration by rippling (“choppy waves” or “breaking the surface tension”) the surface of the aquarium as it exists back into the aquarium from the filter.
It does not do the following task:
- Improve the fish’s health by giving good flow and homogeneity in the aquarium.
Flow and Molecular Kinetics
The reason flow is important has to do with the kinetics of molecular capture. A molecule of ammonia gas floating in water has to hit the membrane of an autotrophic ammonia oxidizing bacteria in order for the bacteria to adsorb and “eat” the ammonia. So the faster the flow the more likely it is for an atom to hit the membrane. The same holds true for carbohydrate or protein molecules and heterotrophic bacteria.
This is a very simple explanation for a very complex phenomenon. But it is the reason flow rate is so important. Note this is not a direct relationship. If one doubles the flow the ammonia oxidizing capability might rise 10% to 20%, not 100%. This is because the kinetics of molecular absorption by membranes is simply pretty complex.
Water has to flow at a reasonable rate over the filter media in order for the beneficial bacteria to do their work. But this flow rate is less important than one might assume from all the hype about it. There are two types of fluid flow, “turbulent” and “laminar”. These are what they look like:
When the flow is turbulent the most number of ammonia or other nutrient molecules get to the beneficial bacteria on the side walls of the tube. This effect is dramatic. The wall of the turbulent flow tube could be doing biofiltration at a rate ten to twenty times that of the laminar flow tube.
There is a velocity number where water flow becomes what is termed “turbulent flow” (it is called “Reynold’s Number”). This is impossible to calculate for something as complex as a filter media. Suffice to say that only very large media with low flow rates will have the very poor lamellar flow.
Something like ceramic rings in a canister MIGHT POSSIBLY have lamellar flow with a small pump on the filter. But note our tests of media in canisters showed that surface area was apparently the only variable when ceramic rings were put in a canister. We did not see any drop off that could be assigned to lamellar flow versus turbulent flow.
This turbulent/laminar flow characteristic also applies to hard surfaces in the aquarium proper, not just in the filter. The going mantra says all the surfaces in an aquarium do good biofiltration, including the decorations and the substrate. This is wrong. The reason this is wrong is that the flow over these surfaces is relatively slow and thus lamellar, not turbulent. And it takes turbulent flow to get good biofiltration. So the substrate, rocks and decorations in an aquarium do not have significant colonies of beneficial bacteria on them unless a wavemaker is aimed at them.
A test was run on one inch of gravel substrate versus other filters. The one inch of gravel oxidized one eighth the ammonia that a small cartridge hang on back filter oxidized. So the idea that a gravel substrate acts as a good biofilter is a myth. Given that the gravel substrate has a huge surface area but only had lamellar flow this is a test which proved the type of flow to be very important.
This test can be reviewed at this link:
To Illustrate this step wise function with regards to flow in a VERY IDEALIZED manner, imagine a bottom to top hang on back filter filled with ceramic rings after one month of cycling on an aquarium with small two inch fish:
- At 1 GPH it can remove the ammonia from 1 fish
- At 2 GPH it can remove the ammonia from 1 fish
- At 5 GPH it can remove the ammonia from 1 fish.
- At 20 GPH it can remove the ammonia of 2 fish.
- At 45 GPH it can remove the ammonia of 3 fish.
- At 55 GPH it can remove the ammonia of 20 fish.
- At 100 GPH it can remove the ammonia from 21 fish,
- 150 GPH it can remove the ammonia from 22 fish,
- 200 GPH it can remove the ammonia from 23 fish.
1 – 1 – 1 – 2 – 3 – 20- 21 – 22 – 23. See the stepwise effect of flow and the jump from 3 to 20? This is where turbulent flow begins. Virtually all filters and most filter media will have turbulent flow. So the overriding variable becomes the surface area. Again, this is ONLY a very idealized concept. There is only the gravel substrate testing to support the concept.
There are some other points and myths surrounding flow that need to be examined:
Myth #1: Flow is Directly Important for Fish Health
Then for the false idea that flow is important for the health of the fish in some direct way. This idea that flow improves a fish’s health is not based on any science. The flow in any aquarium with any filter is more than enough to give homogeneous water throughout the aquarium. An aquarium is far too small to have any stratification in its water and even a small flow would interrupt any stratification that might occur.
And what if the temperature of the water is a few degrees different? In nature, at 2 PM on a sunny day, when the water at the surface of a lake is 9 pH and 85 degrees, the water five feet down can be 7 pH and 75 degrees (Wurts and Durborow, University of Kentucky, 1992, and Masser, Texas A&M University, 2012). Yet fish swim up and down through these natural thermoclines rapidly and constantly with no ill effect.
Increased flow out a nozzle of a filter CAN significantly increase aeration IF it is aimed at the surface in such a way as to create choppy waves. So flow in this very limited case is INDIRECTLY linked to improved fish health. The flow must “break the surface tension” or “create choppy waves” in order to improve the fish’s health by increased aeration.
There is another exception here. If the flow across the substrate is very low a brown bulky “fog” of mulm can form above the substrate. This mulm is very detrimental to bottom fish like loaches and corydoras. It causes epistylis on loaches and bacterial barbel disintegration on corydoras. All my aquariums over 29 gallons have wavemakers aimed at the substrate to prevent mulm formation.
Myth #2: Beneficial Bacteria Colonies stop Growing at the End of Cycling
There is another factor beyond flow at work in aquarium filtration. This is the time that a filter media has been in place. Filter media which is three or four months old with a lot of brown gunk on it is a far better filter media than one month old media with only a clear slime on it, assuming the media hasn’t been cleaned of its brown gunk.
There is a very firmly in place myth that beneficial bacteria only grow in number in proportion to the food supply. So once cycling is complete the colonies of beneficial bacteria no longer increase in size and number. This is a very reasonable and intuitive concept so it is VERY difficult for many to see the reasoning as to why it is not true.
Think of it this way. Beneficial bacteria take in food and multiply by dividing in two. So with a large feed of ammonia during cycling the bacteria will multiply at say once every 24 hours. They will multiply every 24 hours till they reach a level of say 1 billion at the end of cycling an aquarium.
If the feed of ammonia stopped cold at the end of cycling the beneficial bacteria would stop reproducing. But the ammonia feed does not stop at the end of cycling, the fish keep adding ammonia. So the beneficial bacteria keep reproducing, only at a slower rate. The 1 billion might then become 2 billion in 48 hours, 4 billion at 96 hours, 8 billion at 192 hours (27 days), etc. So in one month, without increasing the bioload, the capacity of the biofilter will go up by a factor of eight, assuming one doesn’t clean the filter.
Of course this is an idealized line of logic. In actuality it might only be a factor of four. But it is significant. So a filter which haven’t been cleaned in two or more months can accept relatively large increases in fish load without ammonia spikes.
Flow and Brown Gunk in the Filter.
It is POSSIBLE (but highly improbable) to have too much flow through a filter media. If the water flow rate through a media is so high that biofloc cannot form in the media, then no brown gunk can form. This can sharply curtail the ability of the filter media to work well and give crystal clear water.
I’ve only seen this on a ten gallon sump with a 450 GPH pump in it. The sump refused to give crystal clear water even after many months of running. The foam in the sump had very little gunk in it. The flow though the foam was just too great. But this is a very unusual case. The flow rate has to be very high for this to be a factor.
So you have something like – VERY VERY low flows are lamellar and won’t work – VERY VERY high flows will remove the brown gunk and won’t work – and the 99.99% of the flow rates in between these two extremes is very insensitive vis-à-vis filtration versus flow.